![]() |
Luis suarez biting Ivanovich in 2013 |
2010
for Ajax and 2013 for Liverpool Suarez lost his mind and bitt another player.
Newspapers and social media off course wrote about it fast after it had happened, but what did the different papers and media write?
I looked into three different newspaper who all wrote about Luis Suarez biting
Chiellini.
- Sky Sports (UK)
Luis
Suarez may be in trouble after appearing to bite Italy's Giorgio
Chiellini.
-What this headline tells me is that they wrote about it quickly after it
had happened. They wrote, "After appearing to bite" which means that
they were not sure if Suarez bitt Chiellini or if he just ran in to him with
his teeth first.
![]() |
Suarez with a bitingmask |
-They also have a picture of Suarez taken in the match; in the picture he is holding his teeth clearly in a lot of pain after he collided with Chiellini
- This article is very short, and I think it is because they published it even before the match was finished. They have no interviews, or reactions, just a few sentences about what happened.
- CNN Sports (USA)
Luis
Suarez embroiled in new 'biting' storm.
- in this article there is a video, in
the video there is a guy talking about what happened in the match, there
is also a interview with Suarez after the match where he talks about the
incident.
- "The only thing i know is that those are occurrences that happen on the pitch. I just collided with his shoulder. They are casual incidences that occur during a soccer game,"
Suarez said after match. He later on admitted that he had bitt Chiellini and not collided with him.
![]() |
Chiellini |
Chiellini said after the match, clearly angry after what happened in the match.
-Sportsnet (Canada)
- The first thing i noticed when i read the article was that they call
football for ''soccer''.
- They have interviews and reactions after the match, and information
about the incident.
![]() |
Picktures from the game. |
Comparing the three different media, I think CNN and Sportsnet used most time on the article. Because they had interviews and reactions after the match as I said before sky sports probably published the article even before the match was finished witch is most likely the reason why it was a short article with only information about what happened.
The similarities
between the articles must be that in all of them the writers doesn’t take
Suarez side, it feels like because he has bitt someone before they are almost
sure that he had done it again and not collided with Chiellini like he said
after the match.
This is a comment that goes for all your blog entries so far: I think the content is fine in all, and we all liked your presentation about Soarez because you had structured your talk really well. What you can do to make your blog look even better is to either write in Word,or copy your entries into Word and run a spell and grammar check before publishing.
SvarSlettI liked the presentation! I learned a bit more about the situation. Good work!
SvarSlett